Google knowledge panels
We build the press record and profile work Google needs to show a knowledge panel for OnlyFans and adult creators. So when a brand, a journalist or a new fan searches your name, they find you, not a leak site.
One honest hour. We search your name with you, show you what Google currently thinks you are, and tell you how far you are from a panel.





Our creators have been featured in
Google doesn’t sell panels and there’s no form to request one. It builds them for people it’s confident are real, notable and clearly identified, and it decides that from what independent sources say about you. Panels built on thin, self-published profiles tend to vanish. Panels built on coverage in recognised titles stick. Coverage is what we do.
Press first, then the profile work that ties it all to you.
We search you the way Google does, map what’s right, wrong and missing, and set up an official home page with structured data listing every profile that’s really yours.
We place your story in national and international titles, using the same name, description and profile links every time, so Google connects the coverage to you.
Where your coverage meets Wikidata’s notability rules, we set up your entry there. We’re honest about Wikipedia: it’s unrealistic for most adult creators, so we don’t sell it.
When your panel appears we help you claim it, so you can choose the photo and suggest edits. Eligible US, Canada and India creators can also claim a Google Search profile.
Panels drift. We keep the coverage coming and correct wrong facts, outdated photos and links that point to the wrong account.
Most creators use a professional name, and that’s fine. What matters is that every source uses the same one.
On the discovery call we search you live and show you what Google sees now: the gaps, the leak sites and the name clashes.
We run press placements and set up your official profiles and structured data, so the evidence points one way.
Once the panel appears, we claim it with you, fix what’s wrong and keep it fed with fresh coverage.
Wikipedia’s editors twice ruled she wasn’t yet notable. Then we broke her earnings story. Today Google shows her a full knowledge panel.
Sophie signs with NudePR. She has a big following on subscription platforms, but no national coverage and nothing on Google beyond her own profiles.
We place her story about paying off her parents’ debts in The Sun and the Daily Mail. The same month, Wikipedia declines an article about her because she is “not yet shown” to be notable.
We break her earnings story in The Sun. The New York Post runs it on 3 December, and People, the Independent and the South China Morning Post follow on 11 December.
After a second rejection on 4 December, her article is accepted. Its opening line is the $43 million story, and five of its sixteen sources cover it.
Search her name and Google shows her photo, a description, her date of birth and her official profiles, drawn from those sources.
We don’t write Wikipedia articles and nobody can promise Google will build a panel. What we can do is create the independent national coverage that both rely on.
Sophie Rain: 132 pieces of national coverage. Holly Jane: 68, led by the Daily Star. Vera Dijkmans: 65 placements across UK and US press. Counted in published articles, the same record Google reads.

Global News · 132 pieces
Sophie Rain

The Daily Star · 68 pieces
Holly Jane

Daily Star · 65 pieces
Babestation

The Sun · 65 pieces
Vera Dijkmans

The Sun · 36 pieces
Bonnie Locket

The Sun · 34 pieces
Fenella Fox
Coverage earned for our clients in the national and international press.






We guarantee: a set number of press placements every month, plus the entity and profile work above.
We don’t guarantee: that Google shows a panel by a set date. Nobody can. Anyone selling a guaranteed panel in days is usually relying on sources Google later discards.
Either way: the coverage keeps working for you. It’s the same record that drives verification, brand deals and mainstream recognition.
It depends on how much independent coverage already exists about you. With little or none, expect months rather than weeks, because the press record has to be built first.
Yes. Google builds panels for people it can identify and corroborate, not for particular professions. Mainstream coverage written for a general audience is what tips the balance.
No. Wikipedia helps when it exists, but many people have panels without one. We focus on press coverage and Wikidata, which are realistic for creators.
Yes. Most creators use their professional name. What matters is that every source uses the same one.
Once it’s claimed you can suggest edits to Google, such as the photo, description and profile links. Google decides whether to accept them. We handle that process for you.
It’s built into a monthly PR plan with a guaranteed number of placements. We scope it on the discovery call rather than quote a one-size price.
Doing it yourself? Read our step-by-step guide on how to get a Google knowledge panel. Want the full press service? See our OnlyFans PR agency.
A small, specialist team from the UK national newsrooms. The people who pitch your story are the people you speak to.

Jody Knowles
Director

Christie Hart
Director

Almara Abgarian
Sex Expert & Journalist

Keir Thorne
PR expert

Katie Stainton
Account Manager

Ade Jolaosho
Client Success
Book a call and we’ll search your name with you, live, and tell you honestly how far you are from a panel.
We use cookies that make the site work, and optional ones that tell us which pages people read. Analytics stay off unless you turn them on. Privacy policy.